“Whoever attacks the history of Russia, attacks Russia. “Whoever attacks the history of Russia, attacks Russia Volodin considers criticism of the tsarist and Soviet periods of the country's history to be“ attacks on Russia ”

https: //www.site/2017-04-21/volodin_schitaet_atakami_na_rossiyu_kritiku_carskogo_i_sovetskogo_periodov_istorii_strany

"We are discussing a very serious topic"

Volodin considers criticism of the tsarist and Soviet periods of the country's history as "attacks on Russia"

Komsomolskaya Pravda / Global Look Press

Criticism of both the Tsarist and Soviet periods in Russian history are attacks on the country. This, as reported by TASS, said the speaker of the State Duma Vyacheslav Volodin, commenting on the speech of the deputy from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation Dmitry Novikov, who condemned the authors of the previously submitted bill on the reburial of Vladimir Lenin.

“Given that we are discussing a very serious topic, let's proceed from the fact that the one who attacks the history of Russia before (19) 17 is attacking Russia, the one who attacks the history of the Soviet period, as Dmitry Georgievich (Novikov) spoke about, attacks Russia. But one cannot say that whoever attacks the history of the Soviet period is attacking Russia, but at the same time, if he attacks the history of Russia before (19) 1917, that he is speaking the absolute truth, ”Volodin said.

“Considering that our history is centuries-old, millennial, we will reach a consensus, which is why yesterday those deputies from United Russia who were initially carried away by the initiative that you criticize, they withdrew their signatures, because they understood that this is wrong, this cannot be done ", - said the chairman of the lower house of parliament.

On the eve of the State Duma deputies from the Liberal Democratic Party and "United Russia" submitted to parliament a bill with amendments to the law "On burial and funeral business." Later, United Russia members withdrew their signatures. In particular, the deputies envisaged the creation of an interdepartmental commission, which will deal with the issue of reburial of the remains of historical figures. We are talking about the leader of the Bolsheviks Vladimir Lenin, the legal grounds for the reburial of which are now absent in the legal field.

The leader of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Gennady Zyuganov, called the idea of \u200b\u200bLenin's burial "the largest provocation against Russian statehood," and the deputies who introduced the bill to the State Duma were "complete scoundrels." Zyuganov also urged the Security Council of the Russian Federation to pay attention to this bill. According to him, "the guarantors must give a guarantee of stability in the country."

Meanwhile, according to the latest poll by VTsIOM, 63% of Russians consider it necessary to reburial Lenin's body, 32% of respondents said that the body of the Soviet leader should be buried in a cemetery immediately, 31% - that it should be buried, but when the older generation of those for whom Lenin is expensive ...

During the discussion of the bill submitted to the State Duma on the burial of Lenin's body, State Duma Chairman Vyacheslav Volodin called criticism of the tsarist and Soviet periods in Russian history "attacks on the country." Again, Volodin himself speaks best for Volodin. Exhaustive.

“Given that we are discussing a fairly serious topic, let's proceed from the fact that whoever attacks the history of Russia before (19) 17 is attacking Russia, the one who attacks the history of the Soviet period, as Dmitry Georgievich (Novikov) spoke about, attacks Russia. But one cannot say that the one who attacks the history of the Soviet period is attacking Russia, but at the same time, if he attacks the history of Russia before (19) 17, that he is speaking the absolute truth.
Here, recognizing only our history, given that it is centuries old, millennial, then we will reach a consensus, which is why yesterday those deputies from United Russia, who were initially carried away by the initiative that you criticize, they withdrew their signatures because they understood this wrong, it cannot be done.
But there is also the position of the moral leader of United Russia, who has repeatedly spoken about this, so we must be guided by the position of the person who created the party. In this regard, you are correct, but then let’s look for a consensus in relation to what we had before (19) 1917, because Natalya Vladimirovna Poklonskaya, she will probably not agree with you. ”

The endless series of pearls continues. But I really don't understand - what does it mean to "attack the history of Russia"? Does that mean you can't say anything critical about her? It means that hundreds, thousands of pages need to be erased, where historians, both tsarist and then Soviet Russia, criticized the oprichnina, the cruelty of Peter's reforms, Nikon and the church schism, immorality in personal life Catherine the Great, intolerance and extravagance of Paul I, indecision of Alexander I, cruelty and doctrinairism of Nikolai Palkin, half-heartedness of Alexander II's reforms, nationalism of Alexander III, mediocrity of Nicholas II. I'm not talking about serfdom, for example. And the same applies to the same Lenin-Stalin, the GULAG or the totalitarianism of the Soviet Union.
What kind of baida? What kind of insanity? The further into the forest, the more bears. Do they generally understand something themselves, what they say, have at least some opinion of their own, except for the opinion of a "moral leader" (a new term, by the way)? Or just a refraction of what Putin will say? And then, depending on how he will be understood, given that V.V. most often speaks with big reservations. Hence, including their tongue-tied language - suddenly they blurt out something, not neatly.
In general, I understand how funny my questions and my artificial pathos sound. But honestly - I CANNOT understand how it all happens there, how the brains work, how the psyche is arranged, in which “fireproof safe is the conscience hidden”? In short, all blah blah blah. I'm tired of writing about all this ...

PS
And all the polls about Lenin are on duty and meaningless. Including the next - to bury the leader of the world proletariat or not? The question is significant, but rhetorical. For everyone understands - to bury. As, incidentally, and the fact that the government will wait until the last ... a communist, so as not to "split the country." Because, by and large, she doesn't give a damn about Lenin and his grave. She would have "calmness" in her understanding and "stability", again in her understanding. Not to scare the fish.

ON THIS TOPIC

"The fact that the result brought such support to our president is, of course, an indicator that the citizens of Russia living in the United States, Great Britain, France understand that, making their choice in support of Putin, they support Russia," he said. head of the Duma. In his opinion, British Prime Minister Theresa May, with her unsubstantiated accusations against Russia, acted as an agitator who mobilized Russians.

Speaking about the actions of the president, Volodin noted that Putin with his service, work and deeds proved how much can be done for our country. "And the citizens of Russia, regardless of their party and political preferences, united around him," the speaker stressed.

Talking about the situation in Ukraine, where the authorities and nationalists staged a blockade polling stations in Russian diplomatic missions, Volodin noted that Kiev is increasingly leaving the international legal field. "Ukraine did not allow Russian citizens to vote, because it was afraid of the results of their choice," said the State Duma speaker. He believes that if elections were allowed on the territory of Ukraine, and the citizens of Russia could express their position, Putin would receive the same absolutely high result of support there as in other countries.

Vyacheslav Volodin also commented on the initiative of opposition leader Alexei Navalny, who suggested voters to boycott the elections. "Citizens took and responded to Mr. Navalny's initiative with a higher turnout," the Duma speaker said.

In Russia, on March 18, presidential elections were held, which, as expected, won the current head of state. According to the latest data, Vladimir Putin scored 76.69% of the vote for them, the communist Pavel Grudinin enlisted the support of 11.77% of citizens, and the permanent leader of the Liberal Democratic Party Vladimir Zhirinovsky received 5.65% of the vote. Ksenia Sobchak - 1.68% of the support of voters who came to the polls, Grigory Yavlinsky received 1.05% of the vote, Boris Titov, Maxim Suraikin and Sergei Baburin could not go beyond the one percent line.

Did you like the article? Share it
Print article
Up